CCAFS / Climate change / East Africa / Emission Factors / Environment / Greenhouse Gas / Livestock / LIVESTOCKCRP / SLS

Managing the environmental footprint of livestock: Context-specific information needed in Africa

Climate change and its associated global warming, represents one of the greatest challenges on the planet today. It is also one of the most serious threats faced by millions of Africa’s farmers. Agricultural activities including both livestock and crop production, account for approximately 14% of global greenhouse gases (GHG) that are generated by human activity.

In African countries, agricultural GHG emissions often contribute more than 30% to the national GHG inventory. The majority of these agricultural GHG emissions are generated by livestock through digestive processes that decompose and ferment food (enteric fermentation); and manure management. The rest of the agricultural GHG emissions are caused by deforestation and associated soil carbon losses. There are concerted efforts globally (for instance under the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement) to reduce the environmental footprint of all sectors including agriculture and particularly livestock-associated GHG emissions, and Africa has not been left behind.

According to Lutz Merbold, a researcher at the International Livestock Research Institute’s Mazingira Centre, reducing the environmental footprint in Africa needs to go along with increases in production so that the ratio between GHG emissions per unit of product will be reduced to similar values as those found, for instance, in Europe. However, this does not directly imply that current GHG emission estimates for agriculture in Africa can be based on research from industrialized nations. Such generalization is not only incorrect but also hinders efforts to determine GHG emission hotspots. It also hampers actions with great potential to mitigate agricultural GHG emissions on the African continent.

Students from Braeburn High School Visited the Mazingira Centre

Paul Mutuo (left) and George Wanyama (right) research technicians at ILRI’s Mazingira Centre, explain GHG emission measurements in the laboratory to high school students visiting the state-of-the-art facilities (photo credit: ILRI/Dorine Odongo).

Comparing the contribution of individual sectors to GHG emissions, for example the transport sector vs. the agricultural sector, is not straightforward because the GHG emissions are often calculated in different ways. Global GHG emissions estimates for the agricultural sector originate from a life cycle assessment (LCA) based on the Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM) by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); and include direct and indirect GHG emissions. In this case, indirect GHG emissions are those that occur for instance during fertilizer production, while an example of direct emissions is those that come from enteric fermentation and manure management. In contrast, a similar accounting method for the transport sector is still missing and currently, estimates only include direct GHG emissions (ie. exhaust gases from vehicles), and not those produced during the exploration and exploitation of oil and gas resources or for building roads for instance (indirect emissions).


A young cow on a smallholder farm in Western Kenya where data on the environmental footprint of livestock systems is being collected by the Mazingira Centre team (photo credit: ILRI/Lutz Merbold).

Besides a purely accounting approach, it is important to remember that 70% of Africa’s people still rely on agriculture for a living. Consequently, it is critical that GHG mitigation efforts help resource-poor farmers to not only decrease the environmental footprint of their small-scale livestock and whole-farm production systems but to simultaneously increase productivity and improve their livelihoods.

One must also have in mind that, milk and meat provide essential nutrients in Africa and most systems are run well below their optimal capacity or are not productive during some parts of the year, particularly the dry seasons. Improving agricultural productivity, specifically within the livestock sector, and halting or reversing land degradation (which additionally releases carbon from the soil into the atmosphere), are the most superior options to significantly decrease Africa’s GHG emissions per unit of agricultural product.

As part of the Sustainable Livestock Systems program of ILRI, research at the Mazingira Centre in Kenya and other East African countries, focuses on understanding and managing the environmental footprint of agricultural systems without hampering productivity. It aims to provide accurate context-specific information on GHG emissions and nutrient losses of agriculture, to enable predictions of intensification in these systems, and opportunities to adapt to climate change.

Read an ILRI Clippings article on how new studies are providing accurate estimates of greenhouse gas emissions from East African livestock.

You can also read more about what scientists in New Zealand, US and Colombia are doing to reduce GHG emissions from livestock.



One thought on “Managing the environmental footprint of livestock: Context-specific information needed in Africa

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s